Search Results for "Fakeerappa case"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee in Suit for Annulment of Compromise Decree. Court Fee Refund Granted Under Section 66(2)(a) of Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 When Compromise Decree Is Set Aside.

The petitioners, L. Dayananda Reddy and Gayathri D., filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of Recruitment Rules for Civil Judges (Junior Division) — Direct Recruitment Process Upheld. Petitions challenging the selection and seniority dismissed as the Rules were held valid and the process fair.

The petitioners, who were candidates for direct recruitment as Civil Judges (Junior Division) in the Karnataka Judicial Service, challenged the validi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased was a 60-year-old agriculturist earning Rs.6,000 per month; Tribunal's notional income of Rs.4,500 per month enhanced to Rs.6,000 per month with multiplier of 9 and 1/3rd deduction for personal expenses.

The appeal was filed by the claimants (wife and children of the deceased Buddappa) under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Surplus Airport Land to Private Parties. Court holds that acquisition under KIAD Act is for planned development and surplus land need not be returned to original owners.

The petitioners, including an RTI activist and agriculturists, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Karnataka High Court challenging the allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim - Compensation Enhanced for Death of Labourer Due to Wrong Multiplier. Multiplier of 18 applied instead of 12 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for deceased aged 24 years earning Rs.1400 per month.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the wife, minor children, and parents of deceased Kacharu Rathod, challenging the inadequacy of compensation aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Income Proof. Claimants failed to establish deceased's income from business, leading to reassessment of compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 4 October 2002 involving a scooter bearing registration number MH 27/E316 and a truck b...