Search Results for "Exorbitant Interest"

474 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 474 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Appeal Against Single Judge Order Directing Payment of Rs.25,00,000 for Flat Sale Deed; Appellant Claims Amount Was Fixed Without Basis and Housing Board Charges Exorbitant Interest.

The present writ appeal was filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 07.06.2023 passed by a single judge of the Madras High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Pre-deposit Condition Under Punjab VAT Act. Condition of 25% Pre-deposit for First Appeal Held Not Unconstitutional, but Appellate Authority Has Inherent Power to Grant Interim Relief.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals challenging the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which upheld the validity of Section 62(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Alleging Irregularities in LED Streetlight Procurement by Nagpur Municipal Corporation. Court finds no mala fides or procedural violations in tender process, upholds NMC's decision to award contract to lowest bidders.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur disposed of two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) concerning the procurement of LED streetlights by the Nagpur Munici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...