Search Results for "Employer Discretion"

581 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 581 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Limitation Period for Filing Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 Is Not Barred by Delay When Cause of Action Is Continuing.

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from an order of the Industrial Court, Aurangabad, in Revision ULP No.70/2015. The petitioner in WP 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Restoration Application in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Against Bajaj Auto Limited. Industrial Court's Rejection on Merits Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order dated 19.01.2011 passed by the Industrial Court, Aurangabad. The petitioners in Writ Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Probationer Teacher. Rule 16(2) of MEPS Rules Mandates Notice Before Concluding Voluntary Abandonment of Employment.

The petitioner, Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha, a school management, challenged the judgment and order dated 24.9.2015 of the School Tribunal, Aurangab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Matter Due to Failure to Frame Preliminary Issues in Disciplinary Enquiry. Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Pralhad Waman Lahane, was employed as a Banking Inspector at the Jalna District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. He joined as a Clerk on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Employee Abandoned Service by Taking Up Employment Abroad Without Intimation. Clause 13.4 of Certified Standing Orders Validly Invoked to Terminate Employment for Abandonment of Service Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Infomedia India Ltd., engaged the First Respondent as a machine operator at its printing establishment in Mumbai. On 22 June 1992, the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...