Search Results for "Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal"

153 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 153 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Assistant PF Commissioner Due to Delay and Laches in Challenging EPF Damages Order. Petition filed nearly three years after impugned order without explanation for delay, and no merit found in challenge to damages calculation under Para 32A of EPF Scheme, 1952.

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (petitioner) filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Authority's Petition Against Tribunal's Reduction of Damages Under Section 14B of EPF Act. Mens Rea Not Required for Imposition of Damages for Delayed Remittance; Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Lack of Reasons.

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Provident Fund Damages for Delayed Remittance. Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Imposes Strict Liability Without Requiring Mens Rea.

The petitioner, M/s HMT Limited, a Central Public Sector Enterprise, challenged the order dated 2.1.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging PF Liability for Contract Workers. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Para 30 of EPF Scheme for Non-Compliance by Contractors.

The petitioner, M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), challenged an order dated 1.7.2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging PF Applicability and Dues for Seasonal Cotton Processing Unit. Employer's failure to produce records despite multiple opportunities leads to confirmation of liability under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s Ranisati Ginning Factory, a proprietorship engaged in cotton processing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...