Search Results for "Electricity Supply and Distribution Code"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Electricity Supply and Distribution Code"

148 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Electricity Procurement Dispute, Upholding High Court's Direction for Power Purchase from Successful Bidders. The Court affirmed that the Request for Proposal process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003, is binding, and the reduction of procurement quantum from 1000 MW to 500 MW was invalid, requiring adherence to original bid outcomes.

8 Jan 2024

The dispute originated from Rajasthan's initiative to procure 1000 MW of electricity through a competitive bidding process under Section 63 of the Ele...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Distribution Company's Appeal in Electricity Act Case Over Tariff Dispute. The Court upheld the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's order altering the tariff for inadvertent drawal from temporary to regular supply under open access regulations, affirming regulatory authority under Sections 42 and 181 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

17 Feb 2022

The appeal was filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (AVVNL), a distribution company, challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petition Against CGRF Order in Electricity Connection Cost Refund Dispute. Distribution Licensee Not Obligated to Refund Infrastructure Costs for Dedicated Distribution Transformer Under Electricity Act, 2003.

22 Jan 2021

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), a Distribution Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003, filed thre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Electricity Distribution Company in Theft Case: Parallel Assessment Under Section 126 Permissible Despite Criminal Complaint Under Section 135. Assessment Under Section 126 Not Conditional on Consumer Seeking Restoration of Supply.

1 Aug 2019

The case involves an appeal by West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which allowed t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

13 Mar 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice in Electricity Billing Dispute — Petitioner Agro Industry Challenged Retrospective Reclassification and Demand for Arrears Under HT-2(A) Tariff. Court Held That Reclassification Without Prior Notice and Retrospective Application of Tariff Was Unlawful and Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.

7 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s Sri Balaji Agro Industries, is an agro-based industry located at Chicksugur Industrial Growth Center, Raichur. The respondent, GES...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Wheeling and Transmission Charges Not Rent Under Section 194I. Payments for Use of Transmission Lines Held Not Rent as No Transfer of Possession or Right to Use Occurs.

8 May 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that whee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Electricity Dues Dispute — Transferee Not Liable for Predecessor's Arrears Beyond Six Months Under MERC Regulations 2005. The court held that under Regulation 10.5 of the MERC (Electricity Supply Code and Other Conditions of Supply) Regulations, 2005, a transferee is liable only for six months of unpaid electricity charges, not the entire arrears.

16 Sep 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Namco Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Maharashtra St...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)