Search Results for "Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Royalty and Advance Tax Case — Payments for Equipment and Spare Parts Not Taxable as Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Advance Tax Liability When Entire Income Subject to TDS.

The Revenue filed five appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Shipping Company Tax Case — Reimbursement of Telecommunication Costs Held as Income. Payments received by foreign shipping company from Indian agents for use of MaerskNet system treated as revenue receipt, not mere reimbursement, under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves a set of appeals filed by the Director of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the tax...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case: Inland Haulage Charges Covered Under Article 8 of India-Belgium DTAA. The Court held that income from inland transport of cargo to port for international shipping is part of shipping income and not taxable as business profits.

The case involves an appeal by the Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Authority for Advance Ruling's Refusal to Give Ruling on Tax Liability of Capital Gains from Sale of Shares by Mauritius-Based Company. Authority's Order Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction Since Proviso to Section 245R(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Not Attracted.

The petitioner, Mahindra BT Investment Co. (Mauritius) Ltd., a company incorporated in Mauritius and a tax resident there, filed an application for ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Non-Resident Company in Tax Case, Holds That 'Assessee Aggrieved' Includes Any Party Adversely Affected by CIT(A) Order Under Section 253(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal on maintainability and remanded for merits.

The appellant, M/s. Maersk BV (formerly Nedlloyd BV), a company incorporated in the Netherlands and tax resident there, was engaged in operating ships...