Search Results for "Distributor"

224 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Challenging Tender and Work Orders in Cooperative Milk Marketing. Petitions Filed by Warehousing Agent and Co-Packer Against Karnataka Cooperative Milk Federation and Its Unions Alleging Breach of Exclusive Contracts for Telangana Operations.

Background: The case involved two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging certain actions of the Karnataka Co-operative Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against NPPA Demand for Overcharged Drug Prices. Appellant Held Liable as Distributor Under Paragraph 13 of DPCO 1995 Despite Claim of Being Only a Dealer.

The appellant, a pharmaceutical company, challenged demand notices issued by the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) under the Drugs (Pri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Vendor in Food Adulteration Case Due to Manufacturer's Warranty Defense. Vendor of sealed pan masala held entitled to protection under Section 19(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 as he sold the product in original manufacturer's sealed package with warranty.

The appellant was convicted under Section 16(1)(a)(i) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses LPG Distributor's Challenge Against Discontinuation of Home Delivery Charges Beyond Contract Territory. Principle of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Be Invoked Against Statutory Policy or When No Representation Was Made by the Authority.

The petitioner, M/s Jay Gas Agency, a proprietorship firm represented by Sneha Vilas Kulkarni, was appointed as an LPG distributor by Hindustan Petrol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of notice under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be proved by actual delivery or proper postal endorsement; mere dispatch is insufficient.

The petitioner, Ananda Rao Kanthamaneni, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Co...