Search Results for "Dispute Application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Dispute Application"

19028 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19028 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.

26 Nov 2019

This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 8 Application and Refuses Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Rs. 54.46 Crores. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement in the overarching Logistics Agreement and Product Purchase Agreement mandates reference to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, barring the court from passing a decree in the summary suit.

12 Mar 2018

The plaintiff, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., filed a summary suit against the defendant, Haier Telecom (India) Pvt. Ltd., seeking a money dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Awards in Information Technology Upgrade Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Awards Granting Refund and Rejecting Counter Claims.

6 Feb 2015

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by CMC Limited (original respondent in the arbitration) impugnin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Court's Power Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Post-Tribunal Constitution. The Court Held That Courts Can Entertain Section 9 Applications After Tribunal Constitution But Must Examine Efficacy of Section 17 Remedy, with 'Entertain' Encompassing Entire Adjudication Process Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a Cargo Handling Agreement between the parties, containing an arbitration clause. The appellant invoked arbitration via a notic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Arbitration Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Petitioner Permitted to Amend Pleadings to Include Claim for Injunction Against Alienation of Partnership Property. Amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC allowed as it did not change nature of proceedings and was necessary to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

25 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Sanjay Suganchand Kasliwal, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his applications for amendment (Exh.35 and Exh.36) in a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition and Sets Aside Trial Court Order Rejecting Application Under Section 8 of Arbitration Act — Dispute Referred to Arbitration. Agreement Containing Arbitration Clause Not Properly Stamped Does Not Bar Reference Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Aug 2018

The petitioners, Transvahan Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director S.R. Venkatesan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Jurisdiction for Section 34 Challenge to MSMED Act Award Is Governed by Section 18(4) of MSMED Act, Not by Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement. The non obstante provision in Section 18(4) overrides the arbitration agreement, and the Section 34 petition must be filed at the place where the supplier is located.

16 Oct 2024

The case involves a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the jurisd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Family Business Dispute. Dispute Centers on Inclusion of Agricultural Lands Held by Individual Family Members in Family Asset Separation Process.

14 Jun 2013

The appeal arose from a family dispute within the Malhotra family of Pune, who owned and controlled several businesses including Weikfield Products Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. Supreme Court Precedent in Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department Held Binding, District Judge's Order Condoning Delay Restored.

20 Aug 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court....

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — Upholds Validity of Settlement Agreement Under Section 73 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that a settlement agreement recorded by the arbitral tribunal has the same status as an arbitral award and is binding on the parties.

23 Mar 2026

The case involves multiple special civil applications filed by Dhruvkumar Jaswantlal Patel against Rajnikant Prahladbhai Patel (deceased) through lega...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)