Search Results for "Demand of bribe"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sharad Manga Tayade, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge (ACB), Nanded in Special (ACB) Case No.7 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (Appellant No.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Policeman in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, a policeman attached to the Highway Security Squad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Recovery Clerk in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Ravindra Mahadeo Kothamkar, a Tax Recovery Clerk with the Thane Municipal Corporation, was convicted by the Special Judge under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution Failed to Establish that Accused Made a Demand for Illegal Gratification as Required Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Annasaheb Mahadev Bhandare (the accused) by the Special Judge, Kolhapur, in a corruption ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Purushottam Vasant Joshi, was a Maintenance Supervisor in the Taluka Inspector of Land Records office at Miraj. He was convicted by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Manik Dajibaji Bhatkar (accused no.1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vikas Baburao Marathe, a Talathi (revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shriram s/o Timaji Chachane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia in Special Case No. 3/93 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1...