Search Results for "Consolidation scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Consolidation scheme"

142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reverses Lower Appellate Court's Erroneous Reversal of Trial Court's Decree. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Reappreciate Evidence Independently and That a Co-Owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Without Ouster.

11 Nov 2025

The present second appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) against the appell...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Co-owner's Title in Ancestral Property Despite Consolidation Officer's Order Expunging Name. Section 49 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 Does Not Confer Power to Divest Pre-existing Tenure Holder's Ownership Rights.

8 May 2024

The case concerns a dispute over ancestral land in village Mustafabad, Haridwar, originally owned by Angat, who had three sons: Ramji Lal, Khushi Ram,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Records Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners Failed to Establish Possession or Title Over Disputed Land, and Alternative Remedy of Civil Suit Was Available Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioners, Jibhau Sukhdev Deore and others, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation entry made in the revenue records in favor of respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Under Section 32(3) of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Deputy Director Lacked Jurisdiction to Reopen Final Consolidation Scheme After 30 Years. The court held that once a certificate under Section 22 is issued, the scheme attains finality and cannot be reopened under Section 32(3) except for clerical errors.

13 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Padmabai Narayan Chaudhary and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Au...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Certificate Under Section 24 of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 is Evidence of Transfer, Not Certificate of Title. The court held that a certificate under Section 24 is merely evidence of transfer and does not confer title, thus the suit for possession without challenging the consolidation order was maintainable.

19 Sep 2019

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a civil suit for possession of agricultural land. The appellant (original ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners in Land Consolidation Dispute, Holding That Modification Application Under Section 31A of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time and Only Before Settlement Commissioner. Deputy Director of Land Records Lacks Authority to Modify Scheme After 40 Years.

2 Feb 2018

The petitioners, ten individuals, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Director of Land Records, Nasik Division, which allowed an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title Upheld. Court holds that findings of fact by lower courts on possession and title cannot be interfered with in second appeal under Section 100 CPC unless perverse or based on no evidence.

3 Sep 2015

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over land in Udatare, Talu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale Despite Fragmentation Act Restrictions — Condition Precedent of Obtaining Permission Not Fulfilled by Vendor. Vendor's Failure to Obtain Permission Under Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation Holdings Act, 1947 Does Not Bar Specific Performance When Purchaser is Ready and Willing.

29 Nov 2012

The appellant, Shantaram Babu Longale, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 71 of 1981 against the respondents for specific performance of an agreement for sa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Consolidation Orders Under Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Petitioners Failed to Challenge Earlier Orders in Time, and Subsequent Orders Were Merely Consequential.

4 Oct 2011

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a letter dated 2nd February 1990 and a notice dated 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Mutation Entry Validity. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that the Civil Court's decree regarding possession was binding on revenue authorities.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a land dispute between the petitioners (legal heirs of Dattu Appa Patil) and respondent 3 (Rama Yesaba Patil) over mutation entries ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)