Search Results for "Compromise deed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Compromise deed"

454 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 454 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 420 and 471 IPC Following Settlement of Loan Account Approved by Debts Recovery Tribunal — Criminal proceedings cannot continue after compromise of civil debt where no element of cheating from inception exists.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves an appeal by Vijay Kumar Kela and his proprietary firm against an order of the Chhattisgarh High Court refusing to quash criminal pr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Compromise Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioners Failed to Prove Fraud or Misrepresentation. Challenge to Compromise Decree Under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC Dismissed as Not Maintainable and Time-Barred.

19 Dec 2025

The petitioners, Sri Shivarudrappa and Sri S. Somashekar, were defendants No.1 and 3 in O.S.No.24/2011, a suit for partition filed by the respondent, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Order in Execution Proceedings — Compromise Decree Not Violated as Lease Deed Was Not Part of Decree. Executing Court Cannot Go Beyond Decree Terms; Alleged Violation of Lease Deed Not Enforceable in Execution Under Section 115 CPC.

18 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Smt. R. Sharmila, was a tenant in a property owned by the respondent, B. Devakumar. The respondent filed O.S.No.755/2011 for ejectment...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Recall and Review Applications in Bank Loan Assignment Case — Consent Order Recorded on Minutes of Order Cannot Be Unilaterally Recalled. Assignment of Debt and Security by Co-operative Bank to Third Party Under OTS Upheld Despite Subsequent Objections by Liquidator and Suspended Director.

11 Mar 2025

The judgment concerns three applications seeking recall or review of an order dated 21 October 2022 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Megha Lok Adalat Decree in Property Suit — Petitioner Not a Party to Compromise. Decree Passed Without Jurisdiction as Dispute Was Not Referable to Lok Adalat Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

23 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Kishore Baldev Bajaj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a decree dated 25...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Compromise Decree Validity — Oral Statements Not Sufficient to Transfer Ownership Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Sale Deed Executed During Pendency of Appeal Remains Valid and Not Affected by Subsequent Dismissal of Suit.

15 Jul 2024

The case involves a property dispute arising from two rounds of litigation. In the first round, Mansha Ram and others (plaintiffs) filed a suit for de...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Dismissing Compromise Petition in Civil Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The court held that a compromise petition should be liberally construed and the trial court's failure to examine the genuineness of the compromise warranted interference under Article 227.

8 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri K M Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.01.2016 passed...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Dismissing Compromise Petition in Partition Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Trial Court Failed to Examine Genuineness of Compromise and Consent of Parties, Leading to Remand for Fresh Consideration.

8 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri K M Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.01.2016 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Challenge to Compromise Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — Compromise Not Binding as Plaintiff's Advocate Had No Authority to Enter into Compromise Without Express Consent. The court held that an advocate's implied authority does not extend to compromising a suit without the client's express consent, and the trial court erred in rejecting the plaintiff's application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.

20 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Ashok Babulal Agrawal, was the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 29 of 2011 filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Divis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Decree Holder in Specific Performance Suit — Compromise Decree Held Executable Despite Alleged Lack of Court Verification. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree Under Section 47 CPC Unless Decree is a Nullity on Face of Record.

1 Dec 2014

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the decree holder (Rehan Ahmad) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside th...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)