Search Results for "Complainant Withdrawal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Complainant Withdrawal"

191 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 191 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Husband and Manager in Matrimonial Dispute — Lack of Prima Facie Case for Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating. Complaint Alleging Misappropriation of Stridhan and Fabrication of Documents Fails as Dispute is Essentially Civil in Nature, Not Attracting Sections 406, 420, 465 IPC.

6 Aug 2024

The petitioners, accused No.1 (husband) and accused No.2 (manager of the husband's company), filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in MRTP Act Compensation Dispute, Upholding NCLAT's Interest Award. Developer Found Guilty of Unfair Trade Practice for Delayed Construction and Cancellation, Entitling Complainant to Compound Interest Under Section 12B of Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.

31 Jan 2023

The dispute originated from a 1989 flat allotment in Ghaziabad where the original applicant died and was succeeded by her daughter-in-law, who continu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Transfer Petition in Murder Trial Amid Allegations of Unfair Proceedings and Political Interference. Transfer sought under Section 406 CrPC due to alleged political vendetta, witness intimidation, and procedural irregularities including withdrawal of prosecution under Section 321 CrPC set aside by High Court.

17 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court considered a transfer petition filed under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the brother of a deceased victim ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager in Embezzlement Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Misappropriation of Funds

13 Dec 2021

The appellant, N. Raghavender, was the Branch Manager of Sri Rama Grameena Bank, Nizamabad Branch from May 1990 to September 1995. He was convicted by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against MSEB Officials in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Allegation of Role in Company Affairs. Court held that directors/officers of a company cannot be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without specific averments that they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company at the time of the offence.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed by officers of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) seeking quashing of criminal proce...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Rebuttable Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court dismissed the revision application, affirming the concurrent findings of conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of a cheque issued for repayment of a hand loan.

24 Jan 2019

The applicant, Vishnu s/o Amthalal Patel, was the original accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 filed by t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case, Modifies Sentence to Fine. Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Favours Complainant Unless Rebutted by Probable Defence – High Court’s Acquittal Overturned

2 Apr 2025

Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt (Sections 118 & 139 NI Act): The Supreme Court reiterated that once the complainant proves the cheque...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Discharges Accused in Cheating Case — No Deception Where Complainant Knowingly Participated in Illegal Transaction. Ingredients of Section 420 IPC Not Made Out as Complainant Was Aware of the Illegal Purpose of Payment.

25 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Mr. Ashok Haldankar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC challenging the o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 dismissed as complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.

28 Sep 2021

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, S Ramesh Kumar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable In...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)