Search Results for "Comparative Hardship"

130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case Under UP Urban Buildings Act, 1972. Prescribed Authority's finding of bona fide need and comparative hardship under Section 21(1)(a) reinstated as Appellate Authority's reversal lacked sufficient reasoning.

The appeal arose from a landlord-tenant dispute over a cinema building in Allahabad. The appellant, successor-in-interest to Murlidhar Aggarwal, sough...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Eviction decree upheld on grounds of subletting and bona fide requirement; application for comparative hardship dismissed.

The case revolves around an eviction suit filed by the plaintiffs, trustees of Noor Hospital, against the defendant (Shree Durga Trading Co.) for subl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Writ Petitions in Eviction Case Based on Bona Fide Need. Appellate Court's reversal of eviction decrees set aside for ignoring settled legal principles regarding landlord's bona fide need under Section 13(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Nilkanthrao Raghunathji Chute, is the landlord of a building known as 'Sai Sadan' in Nagpur, which contains four shops on the ground f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Eviction Suit on Grounds of Bonafide Requirement under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Bonafide Requirement Upheld – Unregistered Rent Agreement Not a Bar to Eviction

Bonafide Requirement – The landlord (Plaintiff) sought eviction of the tenant (Defendant) on the grounds of bonafide requirement under Section 16(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Landlord's Eviction Decree in Rent Act Case — Subletting and Non-user Established. Section 13(1)(a) and (e) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 applied to confirm eviction for subletting without consent and non-user for six months.

The present Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the petitioners, who were the original tenants, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Tenant's Writ Petition — Bonafide Need of Landlord Established. Landlord's requirement for business expansion and settling sons held genuine under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the tenant (petitioner) challenging the decree for eviction passed by the appellate court under Section 34 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition in Rent Control Case — Reverses Appellate Order Dismissing Eviction Suit. Landlords' Bonafide Need for Demolition and Reconstruction Established Under Section 13(1)(hhh) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The petitioners, who are the landlords of the suit premises, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the District Judge, Solapur, ...