Search Results for "Collusive decree"

226 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 226 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition for Lack of Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Creating Third-Party Rights and Obtaining Consent Decree Without Disclosing Pending Proceedings Do Not Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The case involves a criminal contempt petition filed by Dr. Ramesh D. Pandit and another (original plaintiffs) against Smt. Janabai and others (origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard Writ Petition Challenging Interim Stay of Consent Decree in Fraud Allegations. The Court Examined Whether Third Parties Can Apply for Recall of Consent Decree Under Order XXIII Rule 3 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The writ petition arose from a challenge to an interim order of a Civil Judge staying a consent decree and restoring a disposed suit at the instance o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree-Holder's Execution Against Pendente Lite Purchaser in Possession Suit. Held that a purchaser pendente lite is bound by the decree and can be dispossessed in execution under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC without a separate suit.

The petitioner, Kashinath Ramji Shinde (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a suit in 1987 seeking possession, declaration, and mesne p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell Joint Hindu Family Property by Karta. Readiness and Willingness of Plaintiff to Perform Contract is a Finding of Fact Binding on Appellate Courts.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the defendants (legal representatives of the original defendant No.1 and defendant Nos. 2 and 3) again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit Challenging Compromise Decree. Interpretation of Kachhi Properties Judgment Clarified: No Automatic Stay of Execution Proceedings Upon Filing of Suit for Declaration that Decree is Void.

The Bombay High Court heard two appeals from orders rejecting temporary injunction applications. The first appeal (AO 884/2010) challenged an order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Sale by Karta for Legal Necessity Binding on All Family Members Including Sisters.

The appeal arose from a property dispute concerning 'Moti Building' in Jalna, consisting of four houses. The original plaintiffs, sisters of defendant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise Decree in Partition Suit: Third Party Not Permitted to Invoke Article 226 Against Lok Adalat Award. Writ Remedy Not Available to Strangers to Decree; Proper Recourse Is to File a Separate Suit for Declaration and Partition.

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by five individuals claiming to be members of the same family as t...