Search Results for "Coercive Action"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Coercive Action"

334 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 334 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Interim Order Restraining Filing of Charge-Sheet in Property Dispute Case. The Court held that the High Court cannot restrain filing of charge-sheet under Section 193(3) BNSS while a quashment petition is pending, as it affects the statutory right of investigation.

12 May 2026

The Supreme Court set aside an interim order of the Allahabad High Court that restrained the investigating officer from filing the charge-sheet in a c...

High Court

High Court refused to Quashe FIRs Against Petitioner in Film Promotion Dispute Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) -- Allegations of Abuse and Obstruction to Sustain Criminal Charges

22 Jan 2026

The High Court refused to quash two FIRs registered against the petitioner for offences under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) arising from a film ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ITAT's Interim Refund Order in Pending Appeal — Tribunal Cannot Direct Refund Without Adjudicating Merits Under Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to grant interim relief without hearing the main appeal, as it would render the appeal infructuous and cause prejudice to the revenue.

4 Feb 2014

The Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25 November 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Transfers Multiple FIRs to Delhi Police IFSO Unit in Media Debate Case. Court ordered consolidation of investigation for offenses under Indian Penal Code, 1860, arising from single television broadcast, granting interim protection from coercive action but declining to quash FIRs.

23 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) and criminal complaints filed against the petitioner, a television anchor, in va...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Coercive Execution Order in Child Custody Dispute — Emphasizes Child's Welfare Over Parental Compliance. Court holds that execution of a direction for child counseling cannot be enforced by coercive measures like arrest or attachment against the mother, as the child's best interests and willingness are paramount under the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.

22 Feb 2018

The petitioner-wife challenged an order dated 17 July 2017 passed by the Family Court No.2 at Mumbai, which was passed to execute an earlier order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Demurrage and Other Charges — Amendment Sought to Include Additional Claims and Correct Description of Vessel. Court Held That Amendment Does Not Introduce New Cause of Action and Is Necessary for Determination of Real Controversy.

30 Nov -0001

The present application was filed by the plaintiff, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, seeking amendment of the plaint in a commercial suit for recovery ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Breach of Consent Order in Arbitration Matter. Consent terms recorded in arbitration petition do not constitute a decree, and contempt proceedings are not maintainable for breach of a consent order unless there is willful disobedience of a specific direction.

29 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Ashapura Minechem Ltd., filed a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging that the respondents, Armada (Singa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Secured Creditors in SARFAESI Act Case — Holds Chief Judicial Magistrate Competent Under Section 14. The Court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting that the CJM can exercise powers under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, for taking possession of secured assets in non-metropolitan areas.

23 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court resolved a conflict among High Courts regarding the interpretation of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Interim Protection to Journalist in Multiple FIR Case Based on News Broadcasts. Court Transfers One FIR for Investigation, Stays Other Proceedings, and Emphasizes Balance Between Freedom of Speech and Criminal Process Under Article 19(1)(a) and Article 32 of the Constitution.

19 May 2020

The dispute arose from two news broadcasts by the petitioner, a journalist and editor-in-chief of Republic TV and R Bharat, on 16 April 2020 and 21 Ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Protective Order in Anticipatory Bail Dismissal - No Power to Grant Protection After Rejection Under Section 438 CrPC. The Court held that once anticipatory bail is rejected, the High Court cannot grant any protection from arrest as the proviso to Section 438(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 explicitly permits arrest, and no inherent power exists for such relief.

28 May 2021

The Supreme Court addressed criminal appeals arising from special leave petitions filed by complainants aggrieved by High Court orders. The background...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)