Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

4993 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4993 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Execution Proceedings Under Employees Compensation Act — Section 31 of the Act Provides Exclusive Mode of Recovery, Not Barring Application of CPC Order 21 for Execution of Award.

21 Feb 2023

The petitioner, an insurance company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the execution proceedi...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Executability of Decree on Ground of Non-Compliance with Order XX Rule 4 CPC. Judgment Debtor Cannot Raise Nullity of Decree Under Section 47 CPC After Ex-Parte Decree Became Final and Earlier Application to Set Aside Was Dismissed.

9 Jan 2026

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by Srinivasa Doss (petitioner) against P.Kalaidasan and P.Seshian (respondents) challenging an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint Based on Unregistered Lease and Determination of Lease. Court Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Specific Performance and Monetary Claims Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

4 Mar 2014

The case involved a suit for specific performance and a money decree filed by Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd (plaintiff) against the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Order Rejecting Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC in Recovery Suits — Held That Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Law. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the suits based on invocation of bank guarantees were within limitation and disclosed a cause of action.

5 Jun 2023

The present judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications filed by the Regional Manager and Assistant General Manager of Union Bank of India (o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petitions Challenging Interlocutory Orders Rejecting Applications Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Commercial Suit. Revisions Under Section 115 CPC Barred by Section 8 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Counterclaim Against Co-Defendant Maintainable if It Concerns Plaintiff’s Rights.

25 Nov 2025

The High Court of Karnataka dealt with two civil revision petitions arising out of commercial suits filed by HDFC Bank Ltd. (plaintiff) against a borr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Notice of Motion for Rejection of Plaint in Trust Suit Under Order VII Rule 10A CPC. The Court Examines Whether Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 10A CPC and Limitation Bar the Freshly Filed Suit.

22 Aug 2013

The matter arose from a Notice of Motion taken out by defendant no.7 in a trust dispute suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The plaintiff claim...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.955 OF 2018

2 May 2019

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Sub-Registrars in Cheating Cases — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Absence of Criminal Intent. Proceedings under Sections 420, 468, 471 IPC and Section 82 of the Registration Act, 1908 quashed as the acts were performed in official capacity without dishonest intention.

21 May 2015

The case involves multiple criminal petitions filed by Sub-Registrars (H.S. Cheluvaraju and S.N. Prabha) seeking quashing of charge sheets and proceed...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Defendants' Petition to Strike Out Plaint in Injunction Suit — Order II Rule 2 CPC Bar Not Applicable as Cause of Action in Subsequent Suit is Different from Earlier Suit. The court held that the bar under Order II Rule 2 CPC applies only when the cause of action is the same, and since the present suit was based on a fresh cause of action, the plaint cannot be struck off.

24 Feb 2026

The case involves a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the defendants in O.S. No.25 of 2023, seeking to s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash Compromise Decree in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Held That Compromise Decree Was Not Validly Passed as It Was Based on a Consent Term That Was Contrary to Law and Without Jurisdiction.

5 Jun 2023

The case involves a dispute over property ownership. The original petitioner, Narhar Rango Kulkarni (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), file...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)