Search Results for "Chapter VII MRTP Act"

72 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Reservation Lapses Under Section 127 MRTP Act When Authority Fails to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court held that reservation of land under the Development Plan lapses under Section 127 of the MRTP Act if the Planning Authority fail...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction on Gaothan Land — Upholds Municipal Action Under MRTP Act. Held that construction without valid permission is liable for demolition without prior notice.

The petitioners, Jamshid Kersi Dalal and others, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their building constructed on gaothan land in Pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.

The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Inaction of Planning Authority. Reservation Lapses When Planning Authority Fails to Take Steps for Acquisition Within Six Months of Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Motilal Hirakhanwala, owned lands bearing Survey No. 386 (2.78 H) and Survey No. 389 (1.23 H) within the limits of Jalna Mu...