Search Results for "Cenvat Credit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Cenvat Credit"

99 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 99 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to SVLDRS Demand for Additional Payment of Rs.1,25,23,051/- Due to Incorrect Declaration and Shifting Stands on CENVAT Credit Utilisation Date. The court held that the petitioner's false declaration and inconsistent statements disentitled it from equitable relief under Article 226.

9 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Fork Media Pvt. Ltd., challenged the impugned order (SVLDRS FORM 3) dated 27 January 2022 requiring payment of an additional amount of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

High Court

High Court Quashes SVLDRS-2 and SVLDRS-3 Statements in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Relief Due to Non-Communication of Error in Declaration. The Designated Committee cannot unilaterally revise the amount payable under Section 125 of Finance Act, 2019 without providing an opportunity of hearing to the declarant.

19 Aug 2020

The petitioner, M/s. Jagadish Advertising, an advertising agency, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over CENVAT Credit Counter Claim — Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Limited to Disputes Arising from Contract Terms. Counter Claim for CENVAT Invoices Held Beyond Scope of Arbitration Agreement as No Demand Raised During Contract Period.

23 Oct 2019

The dispute arose between Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) and Go Airlines (India) Limited under an Aviation Fuel Supply Agreement dated 01...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. CESTAT's finding that the assessee had reversed CENVAT credit before removal of inputs as waste is a pure finding of fact not open to challenge under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

25 Jul 2018

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. CESTAT's finding that the assessee had reversed CENVAT credit before removal of inputs as waste and scrap was a pure finding of fact not open to challenge under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

25 Jul 2018

The Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax) filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

24 Jan 2018

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Deduction Case Under Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961. CENVAT Credit Not Eligible for Deduction as It Is Not an Export Incentive Under Section 28(iiia)-(iiie).

13 Aug 2014

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III, Mumbai, appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 29 July 2011, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition in Central Excise Rebate Case — By-Product Export Rebate Allowed. Input Credit Adjustment Permitted Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for Duty Paid on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Final Product, Even if By-Product is Not Manufactured.

6 Apr 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary (Revision Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

25 Oct 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)