Search Results for "Capital Goods"

298 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 298 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Sales Tax on Pan Masala and Gutkha in Multiple Appeals. State Legislatures Empowered to Levy Sales Tax on These Goods Despite Central Excise Levies, as They Are Not Declared Goods Under Section 14(ix) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from judgments of three High Courts concerning the taxability of pan masala and gutkha under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Interest Demand on Bonded Goods Under Customs Act. Interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 is Mandatory and Not Waivable Even for Delays Caused by Customs Authorities.

The petitioners, M/s SBEC Sugar Limited and its shareholder S.S. Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against WPL in Super Bazar Revival Case — No Willful Disobedience of Orders Found. Revival Scheme Implemented Under Court Supervision; Payments Made as Directed.

The judgment pertains to contempt petitions filed against M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) alleging willful disobedience of court orders in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cenvat Credit Case — Clarificatory Amendment Retrospective. Removal of capital goods without use triggers credit reversal under Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The appellant, M/s. Betts India Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) confirming the demand for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Claim for Capital Gains Treatment in Partnership Dissolution Case. Gains from Sale of Land Held as Co-owned Personal Asset Not Business Income Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involved an income tax reference under Section 256 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1988-89. The assessee, an individual ...