Search Results for "CPC Amendment Act 2002"

301 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 301 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Civil Suit — Due Diligence Test Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Not Applicable Before Commencement of Trial. Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Amendment Application on Ground of Lack of Due Diligence When Trial Had Not Commenced.

The petitioners, plaintiffs in a civil suit (O.S. No. 188/2015) pending before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Hungund, filed an application (IA ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance, Directs Execution of Possession in Favor of Appellants. Collusion Between Vendors and Respondents to Frustrate Decree Cannot Defeat the Fruits of Justice

Specific Performance and Possession – The Supreme Court held that the appellants were entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement and po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Restores Suit Dismissed as Withdrawn Without Consent of All Plaintiffs in Representative Suit Under Order I Rule 8 CPC. Suit filed under Order I Rule 8 CPC cannot be withdrawn by some plaintiffs without consent of all and without court permission.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs No.5, 7, and 9, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Unconditional Stay of Arbitral Award in Favour of State Government. Order XXVII Rule 8A CPC Does Not Mandate Unconditional Stay; Court Must Impose Conditions Under Section 36(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arises from a dispute between PAM Developments Private Ltd. (appellant) and the State of West Bengal (respondent) concerning a tender for roa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...