Search Results for "COFEPOSA"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Abdulla Gulam Mustafa, challenged a detention order dated 27.11.2003 issued by the Principal Secretary (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Right to Representation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Infringed Due to Non-Supply of Grounds in Understandable Language and Unexplained Delay.

The Bombay High Court allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Was Frustrated by Delayed Consideration and Failure to Supply Relevant Documents.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mavin Keezhil Mohamed Aslam, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Detenu's Exoneration in Adjudication Proceedings Not Considered by Detaining Authority, Rendering Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Bherchand Tikaji Bora, challenged an order of detention dated 27th August 1998 passed under Section 3(1) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act, Citing Lack of Consideration of Bail Conditions. Court Emphasizes Scrutiny of Detention Orders and Upholds Liberty in Preventive Detention Cases

Preventive Detention and Bail Conditions: The detaining authority must consider the efficacy of bail conditions imposed by the court before ordering ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Advisory Board Opinion in COFEPOSA Detention Case — Advisory Board's Opinion of No Sufficient Cause for Detention is Non-Justiciable and Not Subject to Challenge Under Article 136

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India against the opinion of the Advisory Board constituted under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Supply of Hindi Translation of Documents to Detenu Not Conversant with English. Failure to Provide Translated Copies of Material Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, Pradeep Panchal, son of the detenu Brahmpal Panchal, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated 7 February 2...