Search Results for "CIPLA"

95 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case, Restores Compensation. Functional Integrality between two companies established, making them jointly liable for unfair labour practices under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

The appeal was filed by workmen against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who had set aside the order of the Industrial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Controller's Refusal of Patent Registration Due to Non-Consideration of Arbitral Award and Deed of Assignment. Failure to Appreciate Evidence and Raise Objections in Examination Report Renders Order Unsustainable Under Section 15 of Patents Act, 1970.

The petitioner, Euro-apex B.V., entered into a licence agreement with Shinhan Apex Corporation in 1993, authorizing the latter to manufacture and sell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Objection Despite Dismissal of Main Appeal for Non-Removal of Office Objections. Cross Objection under Section 253(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is an independent proceeding and does not abate with dismissal of appeal.

The case involves a Cross Objection filed by Cipla Limited (the assessee) under Section 253(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in response to an Income T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Complaint Alleging Bogus Contractors Held Not Maintainable in View of Supreme Court Precedents.

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 4th May 2001 passed by the Member, Industrial Court, Pune, dis...