Search Results for "CESTAT remand"

59 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case Due to Incorrect Adoption of Highest Price. Valuation Must Be Based on Most Conservative Price Under Rule 6(b)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 1994, as Per Precedents on Normal Wholesale Cash Price.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal filed by the revenue against an order of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — CESTAT's Finding of Baseless Charges Upheld. Penalty Dropped as Evidence Lacked Direct Link to Respondent Under Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. CESTAT's finding that activity was classifiable under Works Contract Service rather than Erection Commissioning and Installation Service upheld.

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Finance Act, 1994 agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Gutkha Excise Duty Case for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the CESTAT's findings on valuation and penalty were factual and not perverse, and no question of law arose under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves appeals filed by M/s. Trishul Arecanut Granuels Private Limited and its Director, H.S. Nataraj, against the Commissioner of Central ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — Confiscation of Indian Currency Not Sustainably Linked to Smuggling. CESTAT's finding that Revenue failed to establish necessary ingredients for invoking Section 121 of Customs Act, 1962 upheld.

The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai filed an appeal against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Customs Duty Exemption Case for Hospital Equipment. Condition of Free Treatment Under Notification No.64/1988-Cus. Must Be Strictly Complied With for Exemption.

The applicant, M/s National Heart Centre & Hypertension Clinic, through its Director Dr. Shashank Bhalchandra Subhedar, imported a Computerized Stress...