Search Results for "CENVAT Credit"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms CESTAT's Ruling: Labelling Constitutes Manufacturing under Central Excise Law. The Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of "manufacture" under Note 3 of Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, supporting the respondent's cenvat credit claim.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether labelling goods amounts to "manufacture" under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The case revolved aroun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Deduction Case Under Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961. CENVAT Credit Not Eligible for Deduction as It Is Not an Export Incentive Under Section 28(iiia)-(iiie).

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III, Mumbai, appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 29 July 2011, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition in Central Excise Rebate Case — By-Product Export Rebate Allowed. Input Credit Adjustment Permitted Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for Duty Paid on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Final Product, Even if By-Product is Not Manufactured.

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary (Revision Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Petition Against Rebate Claim on Exported Inputs/Capital Goods. Reversal of Cenvat Credit Does Not Constitute Payment of Duty for Rebate Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary to the Government of India dated 4 June 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Stay Order in Cenvat Credit Dispute. Tribunal's Detailed Findings at Stay Stage Prejudge the Appeal and Are Impermissible.

The appellant, CEAT Limited, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th June 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and ...