Search Results for "CAT Mumbai"

111 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 111 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order in Forest Department Recruitment Case. Court upholds CAT's direction to consider respondents for promotion to Forester posts based on seniority and eligibility as per Recruitment Rules.

The State of Maharashtra and forest department officials filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order in Recruitment Irregularity Case. Court upholds CAT's direction to consider candidates for driver posts despite scrapping of select panel due to alleged corrupt practices.

The Union of India and officials of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Employee for Unauthorized Occupation of Railway Land. Petitioner Failed to Prove Title or Permission for Construction, Leading to Dismissal of Writ Petition.

The petitioner, B.S. Rath, joined Western Railway as an Apprentice on 15th February 1965 and later became a Senior Motorman. He was charged with unaut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Quashing Charge-Sheet Against Income Tax Officer. Disciplinary Proceedings for Quasi-Judicial Acts Held Invalid Without Proof of Malafides or Corrupt Motive.

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumbai, dated 26/3/2004, which quashed th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Barring Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Error. Employer Cannot Recover Excess Payment When Employee Did Not Misrepresent and Recovery Would Cause Hardship.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India and others against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which directed the petiti...