Search Results for "Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946"

113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition and Dismisses Union's Petition in Industrial Dispute Over Recognition of Union. Industrial Court's interim order directing recognition of union as sole bargaining agent set aside as beyond jurisdiction under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging an interim order passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai, under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Employer Failed to Prove Voluntary Abandonment of Service; Termination Without Specific Order Held Illegal.

The petitioner, M/s. Empire Dyeing, a textile processing company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Order Declaring Transfer of Employees as Illegal Change Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Transfer from Polyester Department to Spurn Yarn Department Without Notice of Change Violates Section 42 Read with Schedule II Items 1,2,4,5 of BIR Act.

The petitioner, Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 5 December 2006 passed by the Labour Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Registrar's Cancellation of Trade Union Registration for Non-Compliance with Section 28-A of Trade Unions Act, 1926. Failure to maintain proper membership register and file annual returns justified cancellation despite opportunity of hearing.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Mumbai Taximen's Union and its Secretary challenging the order of the Deputy Registrar of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction by National Textile Corporation. Division Bench precedent upholding rollback from 60 to 58 years held binding.

The petitioners, three employees of India United Mills prior to its nationalization under the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalization) Act, 1974, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Challenging Reinstatement Order. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor System, Termination Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 17/9/1999, which reversed the Labou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BEST Undertaking's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Suspension Case. Suspension of Deputy Charge Engineer Held Invalid as Standing Orders Not Applicable, But Unfair Labour Practice Found Due to Non-Compliance with Procedure.

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BEST Undertaking) challenged an order of the Industrial Court which had allowed the complaint of unfair labour...