Search Results for "Bombay Civil Services Rules 1939"

49 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.

The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CAT Order Allowing Change of Date of Birth of IAS Officer. Authorities' Delay in Deciding Application for Correction of Date of Birth Cannot Be Used to Defeat Claim Under Rule 38 of Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981.

The Union of India and the State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging the judgment and order dated 8 March 2016 passed by the Central A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Quota Between Degree and Diploma Holders. Classification based on educational qualifications for promotion from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer is reasonable and not violative of Articles 14 and 16.

The petitioners, K.K. Bhaskaran and Sarjeet Singh, were working as Junior Engineers in the Electrical Department of the Administration of Union Territ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Implementation of De-hiring Policy for Defence-Occupied Premises. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to enforce de-hiring policy against Union of India for flats occupied since 1944 under lease agreements.

The petitioners, Kaikobad Byramjee and Son (Agency) Private Limited and Mr. Khushrooh P. Byramjee, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Cou...