Search Results for "Benami Prohibition Act"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Found Under Section 100 CPC Regarding Will Validity and Adverse Possession.

The case involves a property dispute among family members. The original plaintiff, Indumati Anantrao Naik (since deceased and represented by legal rep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Failure to Establish Criminal Intent Under Section 420 IPC. Allegations of Fraud in Real Estate Transaction Found to Be Purely Civil in Nature, Lacking Ingredients of Criminal Breach of Trust or Cheating.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had dismissed the appellants' petition to quash criminal pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Eviction Suit Between Sisters — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Ownership of Suit Property Vested in Plaintiff as Title Holder, and Defendants Failed to Prove Benami Transaction or License.

The case involves a dispute between two sisters over a residential property in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Vishala Bokapatna Laxman, filed a suit for evict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Agreement to Sell Proved, Limitation and Benami Transaction Objections Rejected.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Family Property Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on possession and tenancy rights upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Anil Sital Hansrajani and another, who are brothers and sons of the respondent Sital T. Hansrajani, filed a petition under Section 34...