Search Results for "BPCL guidelines"

19 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes NOC for HPCL Petrol Pump Due to Violation of Distance Norms Under Petroleum Rules, 2002. Court holds that the appellate authority failed to consider the mandatory distance requirement from an existing petrol pump and the objections of the petitioner.

The petitioner, G. Alagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 19.3.2026 passed by the 1s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed — Pre-trial Amendment Must Be Liberally Allowed to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings. Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits amendment at any stage before trial to determine real questions in controversy between parties.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No. 1210/2017 in 2017 seeking cancellation of a Sale Deed dated 13.11.2016 in respect o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Implead Parties in Suit for Specific Performance — Petitioner Lacks Direct Interest in Property and Cannot Compel Performance of Contract Between Others.

The petitioner, Sri K. Lakshmaiah Reddy, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 22.02.2022 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of New Retail Outlets by Oil Corporations Near Petitioner's Existing Petrol Pump. No Legal Right to Monopoly or Protection from Competition in Petroleum Retail Business.

The petitioner, Digambar Mawal Patil, is a dealer of Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) running a petrol pump at Jalna Road, Sultanpur, District Bu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Dealer in Termination Dispute. No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Arbitrator's Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

The Petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), a government oil company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...