Search Results for "BOT"

75 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 75 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute Between Parties Arbitration Petition Allowed Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Procedural Irregularities

The High Court allowed an arbitration petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute -- The Court found that the arbitral tribunal co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on BOT Concession Agreement — Agreement Not a Lease Under Maharashtra Stamps Act. Concession Agreement for Build, Operate and Transfer of Bridge Held Not to Create Leasehold Interest Under Section 2(n)(iii) of Maharashtra Stamps Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Abhijeet Ashoka Infra Structure Pvt. Limited, entered into a Concession Agreement with the State of Maharashtra on 16/11/1998 for cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12%. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach and damages are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Agarsons Container Terminals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Government Appeal in BOT Bridge Dispute. Court upholds arbitral award granting escalation costs and interest to contractor for owner's delay in providing right of way and toll collection issues.

The Government of Maharashtra, through the Executive Engineer, Alibag Public Works Division, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.

The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal of Land Reservation for Architects' Association. State's Power to Modify Development Plan Under Section 31 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Upheld.

The petitioner, Indian Institute of Architects, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a writ petition under Article 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal of Land Reservation for Architects' Association. State's Power to Modify Development Plan Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Upheld; No Vested Right in Reservation.

The petitioner, Indian Institute of Architects, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a writ petition under Article 2...