Search Results for "BIR Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "BIR Act"

141 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 141 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Housing Allotment Case Over Scheduled Tribe Reservation. The Court upheld the lower courts' decrees, ruling that reservation benefits under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India are confined to the State or Union Territory of origin, and migrants cannot claim such benefits in another jurisdiction without a corresponding Presidential Order.

7 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from an advertisement dated 28.06.1983 by the Chandigarh Housing Board, calling for applications for allotment of houses with reserv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Former Intelligence Commissioner in Leak Case — Lack of Sanction and Limitation Bar. Court holds that prosecution under Official Secrets Act and other statutes requires prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC and Section 170 of Maharashtra Police Act, and is barred by limitation under Section 468 CrPC.

15 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Rashmi Uday Shukla, was the Commissioner of the State Intelligence Department, Maharashtra. On 26 March 2021, an FIR was registered at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in Air India Ltd. — Probationers Have No Right to Be Confirmed and Termination Without Stigma Is Valid.

25 Feb 2019

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Jeetendra Krishna Varma (WP 875/2011) and Mayank Mohan Sharma (WP 1427/2015) against Air India Lt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction for Supervisory Employee in Textile Corporation. Employee Drawing Basic Pay Over Rs.1000 Excluded from BIR Act Definition, Not Entitled to Retirement at 60 Under Model Standing Orders.

29 Jun 2018

The Petitioner, J.P. Fernandes, joined Gold Mohur Mills Ltd. (predecessor of the Respondent, National Textile Corporation (S.M.) Ltd.) as a spinning a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Order Declaring Transfer of Employees as Illegal Change Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Transfer from Polyester Department to Spurn Yarn Department Without Notice of Change Violates Section 42 Read with Schedule II Items 1,2,4,5 of BIR Act.

5 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 5 December 2006 passed by the Labour Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order of Reinstatement with Full Back Wages in BIR Act Case. Employer's Jurisdiction for Misconduct Outside Premises Upheld, but Industrial Court's Power to Re-appreciate Evidence in Appeal Under Section 84 of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 is Affirmed.

12 Jul 2016

The Petitioner, M/s. William Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai which partly allowed the appeal of the first ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interim Relief Order in Industrial Dispute — Tribunal Directed to Reconsider Without Prejudging Merits. Industrial Court's Order Granting Rs.3,500 Per Month to Workmen Set Aside for Lack of Consideration of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Under Section 10(3) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), challenged an order dated 15/04/2011 passed by the Industrial Court, Akola Bench, in Reference (BIR) No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

26 Aug 2010

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Intervention in Industrial Dispute. Petitioners Not Necessary Parties Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

9 Oct 2006

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Empress Mills, a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation Limited, challenging orders passed in B.I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union Secretary's Challenge to Dismissal in BEST Undertaking Case — Delay in Charge Sheet Not Fatal as Permission Obtained from Labour Court. The court upheld the dismissal of a protected employee under Section 101 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, despite the charge sheet being issued beyond six months, as the employer had obtained due permission from the Labour Court.

10 Mar 2006

The petitioner, the General Secretary of the BEST Workers Union, was a protected employee under Section 101 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 19...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)