Search Results for "Authorization Fee"

56 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Online Liquor Delivery Platform in Excise License Dispute. The court held that the petitioner's order processing and delivery services do not amount to 'sale' under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and quashed the Excise Commissioner's letter demanding a license.

The petitioner, Hip Bar Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, offering a semi-closed prepaid payment instrument (mobile ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Student's Claim for Compensation for Loss of Academic Year Due to College's Irregular Admissions. Petitioner accepted full and final settlement of Rs 20 lakhs, barring further claims under principles of accord and satisfaction.

The petitioner, Riya George, a medical student, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking compensation from Kannur Medical Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Interest Demand on CLIII License Renewal Fee. Excise Department Cannot Levy Interest Without Specific Statutory Provision Under Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 or Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953.

The petitioners, Maheshprasad Dwarkadas Jaiswal and Rajeshwar Dwarkadas Jaiswal, are CLIII license holders for a liquor shop at Shahabazar, Aurangabad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Development Charges Demand by Nagpur Improvement Trust on Transferee of Regularized Plot. NIT Lacks Competency to Impose Additional Charges After Regularization Under Maharashtra Gunthewari Act, 2001.

The petitioner, Pramod Ganpatrao Pinge, challenged a demand notice issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT) calling upon him to pay additional reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...