Search Results for "Article 25(b)"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with 30% Backwages for Workman. Termination of Daily Wager Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The judgment arises from two Special Civil Applications filed under Articles 14, 21, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India read with the Industria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Forest Corporation's Appeals Against Reinstatement of Daily Wage Workers. Daily wage employees with 240 days of continuous service are entitled to reinstatement under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves multiple Letters Patent Appeals filed by the Divisional Manager, Forest Development Corporation, Nashik, against the reinstatement o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Reduced Stamp Duty on Development Agreements Under COVID-19 Concession. Development Agreement Not Equivalent to Conveyance; Notification Under Article 25(b) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Inapplicable.

The petitioner, M/s. Sandeep Dwellers Private Limited, a construction company, entered into three development agreements dated 28.12.2020, 31.12.2020,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal of Trainee Conductor in KSRTC Dispute — Labour Court Award Restored. Termination of Trainee Conductor Without Enquiry Held Illegal as Trainee is a 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, Hanumanth Ramanna Bajantri, was appointed as a job trainee conductor by the North West Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (the Corpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Striking of Election Petition Paragraphs in Municipal Election Dispute. Court upholds that vague allegations of corrupt practices without specific details of consent by the returned candidate are liable to be struck off under Order VI Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioner, Eknath Bayaji Gadkari, filed an election petition under Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenging the e...