Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee"

150 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes APMC Notices Requiring License for Poultry Feed Purchase — Food Grains for Personal Consumption Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under KAPMR Act, 1966. Purchase of food grains solely for feeding poultry is personal consumption, not trade, and does not require license under the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966.

6 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Lakshmi Poultry Complex and Kittur Chennamma Poultry Farm, are engaged in large-scale poultry farming, rearing around five lakh b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Agriculture Produce Market Committee Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Rules. Court holds that failure to provide reservation for Scheduled Tribes in the office of Chairperson as per Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Rules renders the election process invalid.

6 May 2019

The petitioners, eleven agriculturists from Bhandara district, filed a writ petition challenging the election of the Agriculture Produce Market Commit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Violation of Natural Justice. Order of Supersession Under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Show Cause Notice Requirement.

14 Jan 2019

The petitioners, who were members of the Umrane Agricultural Produce Market Committee, challenged the order of supersession of the committee passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 45(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963. Show-cause notice under Section 45(1) must specify charges and opportunity of hearing must be granted before superseding the Board.

25 Apr 2017

The petitioners, who were the elected Board of Directors of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malegaon, challenged the order of the District ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Grampanchayats to Participate in APMC Elections as Nominees of Local Authorities Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Grampanchayat Held to Be a Local Authority Entitled to Nominate Members to APMC Under Section 11 of the Act.

29 Sep 2015

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats (village councils) in Maharashtra challenging the rejection of their nomination form...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Elections to Market Committee Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Notification Requirement. Court holds that elections cannot be ordered until State Government issues notification under Section 13(1B) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963, specifying number of members and reserved categories.

19 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Shekhar Ramchandra Badade, claiming to be an agriculturist and member of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Neera, filed a wri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

16 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Inclusion of Dry Fruits Under APMC Act — Notifications Ultra Vires. Definition of Agricultural Produce Under Section 2(a) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is Exhaustive and Does Not Include Dry Fruits/Dry Dates.

17 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing in dry fruits and dry dates, challenged the validity of notifications dated 20.6.1988 and 18.10.1988 issued...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Directing Re-election of APMC Newasa and Bhusawal — Model Code of Conduct Cannot Override Statutory Provisions of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Minister's Order Violated Principles of Natural Justice and Was Without Jurisdiction as Election Process Had Already Commenced Under Section 14 of the Act.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging orders of the Minister for Cooperation, Marketing and Textile Department, Maharashtra, directing ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)