Search Results for "Age of victim"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim Was Below 18 Years.

The appellant, Kawadu Madhukar Atram, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case 70 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 363, 376, 506, 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Age of Victim and Relied on Unreliable Sole Testimony.

The case involves an appeal against conviction for offences under Sections 363, 376, 506 and 342 IPC. The appellant, Dada Laxman Gaikwad, was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

The appellant, Prashant Korwate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC read with Section 3 punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Consent-Based Sexual Relationship Not Rape Under Section 375 IPC as Promise of Marriage Was Not False from Inception.

The appellant, Amit Shende, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence on Age of Victim. Consent of Victim Above 16 Years Renders Sexual Intercourse Not Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Pande, was convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape of a minor girl, Latiba (PW2), and sentenced to seven years rigorous imprison...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(f) and 366A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Santosh Thorat, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The appellant, Digambar s/o Pandurang Kadu, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abhang s/o Laximan Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Chandrashekhar s/o Bhagwan Meshram, was convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for an offence under Section 376...