Search Results for "Admiralty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Admiralty"

78 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Vacates Arrest of Vessel GEOWAVE COMMANDER for Lack of Ownership Link — Plaintiff's Claim Against Charterer Does Not Justify Arrest of Vessel Owned by Third Party. The court held that the plaintiff's misleading statements regarding ownership of the vessel vitiated the ex parte arrest order, and the vessel could not be arrested for a claim against a bareboat charterer when the owner was a different entity.

17 Apr 2013

The plaintiff, Yusuf Abdul Gani, sole proprietor of Jumbo Offshore Enterprises, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel GEOWAVE COMMANDER (GC) seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Admiralty Suit for Bunker Supply Claim Against Foreign Vessel. Supply of bunkers to vessel 'LIMA II' held to be a maritime claim within admiralty jurisdiction, and arrest of vessel justified.

8 Nov 2006

The plaintiff, Jupiter Denizcilik Tasimacilik Mumessillik San. Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, a Turkish company engaged in the supply of bunkers, filed a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion for Determination of Priority of Claims Against Sale Proceeds of Arrested Vessel in Admiralty Suit. The court directed that the order of priority of claims against the sale proceeds shall be determined after the expiration of a period specified by the court and that a notice inviting claims be published under Sub-rule 951(3) of the Bombay High Court Rules.

19 Oct 2012

The plaintiff, Sparebanken Sogn og Fjordane, a Norwegian bank, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. BOS ANGLER and its owner Bos Angler AS,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Bunkers Supply — Holds That Bunkers Are Necessaries and Arrest Valid Under Admiralty Jurisdiction. The court upheld the arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace for a claim for bunkers supplied as necessaries, affirming the High Court's inherent admiralty jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an admiralty suit filed by Lufeng Shipping Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, against the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, a Panamanian-flag vesse...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Vacation of Vessel Arrest in Maritime Claim for Necessaries and Hire. Court holds that under the Admiralty Act, 2017, a demise charterer is not the owner for the purpose of arrest, and a claim for necessaries does not give rise to an action in rem against a vessel owned by a third party.

10 May 2013

The appellant, Sunil B. Naik, filed an appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 17 April 2013 vacating the arrest of the vessel Geow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Referral of Admiralty Suit to Arbitration Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Arbitration Agreement Enforceable Despite Admiralty Claim. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement between parties mandates referral of the dispute to arbitration, and the admiralty suit cannot proceed in court.

6 Jul 2005

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking referral of an admiralty...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Arrest of Vessel for Maritime Claim Under Admiralty Act, 2017 — Bunker Supply Constitutes Necessaries. The court held that supply of bunkers to a vessel is a maritime claim under Section 4(1)(l) of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction & Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017, and granted conditional arrest subject to furnishing of security.

6 Feb 2026

The plaintiff, Om Freight Forwarders Limited, a company engaged in freight forwarding and bunker supply, filed a civil suit under the Admiralty (Juris...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Plaintiff to Bear Costs of Discharge and Storage of Arrested Cargo in Admiralty Suit. The court held that a party who secures an order of arrest of cargo cannot insist that the shipowner bear the costs of discharging and storing the cargo, as the shipowner is not a party to the arrest and the cargo is in custodia legis.

27 Jun 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the owner of the vessel m.v. Ocean 39 (the ship interests) seeking directions against the plaintiff, Cup...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Motion to Vacate Arrest of Indian Flag Vessel for Maritime Claim for Necessaries. Claim for necessaries is a maritime claim under admiralty law, and Indian courts have jurisdiction over Indian flag vessels.

9 Jun 2015

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Amrut Dredging and Shipping Limited, a third party purchaser, seeking to vacate the arrest of the vessel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

20 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)