Search Results for "Acquisition Order Quashed"

1026 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1026 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition in 1960s Case — Section 6 Declaration Issued Within One Year of Section 4 Notification, No Lapse Occurred.

The petitioners, owners of lands in Borla and Deonar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company's Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Title Not Established. Company failed to prove ownership of acquired lands, hence no locus standi to challenge awards under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Mandamus for Land Acquisition Due to Lapsed Reservation and Financial Incapacity. Reservation under Development Plan Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966, and Acquisition Not Mandated as Corporation Lacked Funds Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

The dispute involved a land reservation under the Kolhapur development plan sanctioned in 1999 for public purposes like parking and garden. The landow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Releasing Land from Acquisition in Pimpri Chinchwad Development Case. Minister Exceeded Powers Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by Not Recording Reasons and Ignoring Public Interest.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority challenging an order dated 21st September 2004 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications for Tourism Project — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as No Personal Right or Public Interest Established.

The petitioner, Arjun Mahadev Harmalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, ...