Search Results for "surplus land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "surplus land"

327 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 327 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Partition Dispute, Reversing High Court's Decision on Self-Acquired Property Status. The Court held that the High Court exceeded jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by deciding a factual issue, and the property was self-acquired as purchased after partition using own funds, not joint family funds.

22 Apr 2025

The dispute involved a property partition suit among family members. The appellant, as Defendant No.2, purchased the suit property from Defendant No.1...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Encroachment Suit — Remand Order Set Aside for Exceeding Appellate Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC. The First Appellate Court's order reversing trial court's dismissal and remanding for fresh trial was held to be without jurisdiction as the suit was not disposed of on a preliminary point.

20 Dec 2019

The case arises from a suit for removal of encroachment and possession filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original de...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit by Tamil Nadu Against Karnataka Over Pennaiyar River Water Dispute — Maintainability Barred Under Article 262 and Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956. Court Holds That Disputes Relating to Inter-State River Waters Are Exclusively Triable by a Tribunal Under the ISWD Act, 1956, and Not by the Supreme Court Under Article 131.

14 Nov 2019

The State of Tamil Nadu filed Original Suit No. 1 of 2018 under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the State of Karnataka and the Union ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Taken Before Repeal Date. Land declared surplus under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 but not taken into possession before repeal on 29.11.2007 stands excluded from the Act.

24 Mar 2017

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) challenging the continued application of the Urb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree for Possession and Damages. Defendant's Possession Not Protected Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Due to Breach of Contract and Non-Performance.

6 Mar 2014

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Deorao Balaji Bhoyar (since deceased, through legal representatives), against the j...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deduction Under Section 80IB(10) for Housing Project Despite Prior Construction on Same Plot — Conditions of Commencement After 1-10-1998 and Approval After That Date Satisfied for New Building 'E'. The court held that each building can be a separate housing project if approved after the cutoff date, and the assessee is eligible for deduction.

28 Mar 2012

The case involves two appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing deduction under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Reopening Notices Under Ceiling Act Due to Limitation. Additional Commissioner's power under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 must be exercised within three years from the date of the original order; notices issued after 16 years are barred.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Balasaheb Bhaurao Muley, a resident of village Irlad, was the original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act — Notice Issued After 17 Years Quashed for Being Beyond Limitation Period. The court held that the Additional Commissioner must initiate suo moto enquiry within 3 years from the date of the original order, and failure to do so renders the notice without jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Pandit Dnyanoba Gawali, as legal heir of deceased Dnyanoba Ramkrishnarao Gawali, challenged a notice dated 03.09.1992 issued by the Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice in Ceiling Act Case. Additional Commissioner's Notice Issued After 16 Years Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Kondabai, as legal heir of deceased Gangubai Kadam, challenged a notice dated 23.06.1992 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Aurang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition in Urban Land Ceiling Exemption Case — Quashes Penalty and Directions Restricting Registration and Plan Sanction. Exemption Under Section 20(1) of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, Is Complete and Cannot Be Subjected to Further Conditions or Penalties.

8 Jul 2010

The petitioners, owners of land in Thane District, challenged two letters: one dated 11-2-2009 directing the Municipal Council and Sub-Registrar not t...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)