Search Results for "special planning authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "special planning authority"

1155 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1155 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Notice Under MRTP Act — No Tenancy Rights in Unauthorized Structure. Notice under Section 55(1) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 for demolition of unauthorized construction held valid as plaintiff failed to prove lawful tenancy or ownership.

29 Apr 2005

The appellant, Bales Sardara Paracha, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Mumbai seeking a declaration that a notice dated 15th December 2004 issu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 — Held That Notice Under Section 116(2) Is Not a Condition Precedent for Reassessment Under Section 116(1).

5 Dec 2025

The petitioners, owners of a property in Baramati, challenged the reassessment of property tax by the Baramati Nagar Parishad. The property was origin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Hospital to Set Up Oxygen Generation Plant in Municipal Garden During COVID-19 Pandemic. Public Interest in Saving Lives Overrides Municipal Objection to Use of Public Garden for Life-Saving Facility.

21 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Viveka Super Specialty Hospital & Research Centre Private Limited, filed a writ petition seeking permission to set up an oxygen genera...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.

7 Jun 2006

The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Plot Allotment and Forfeiture by CIDCO — Directs Issuance of Demand Letter for Second Installment with Late Payment Charges. The court held that the cancellation was arbitrary and violative of legitimate expectation, as CIDCO itself had sought relaxation of time limits under Regulation 15 of the New Bombay Disposal Land Regulations, 1975, which was approved by the State Government.

10 Sep 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Trishul Construction Co., was allotted three plots by CIDCO (respondent No.1) in 2007. The payment schedule required a first inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petitions for Deemed Lapse of Land Reservations under MRTP Act. Court Considers Whether Purchase Notices Served on Appropriate Authority Under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Were Valid.

12 Mar 2019

The two writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the reservations imposed on the petitioner...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)