Search Results for "revenue officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "revenue officer"

6023 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6023 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reopening Based on Tangible Material and Valid Sanction Upheld. The court held that the notice under Section 148 was validly issued as the Assessing Officer had reason to believe that income had escaped assessment due to the petitioner's failure to disclose foreign assets fully and truly.

10 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Jagesh Savjani, filed a writ petition challenging the reopening of his income tax assessment for Assessment Year 2014-15 under Section...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Disallowance of Interest and Depreciation. Held that interest on borrowed capital used for acquiring a capital asset is allowable as deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and depreciation on assets acquired under a hire purchase agreement is allowable under Section 32.

12 Jun 2018

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax) against the orders of the Income...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Share Issue Expenses to Dilute Foreign Equity as Capital Expenditure Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Interest on Share Application Money Cannot Be Adjusted Against Such Capital Expenditure.

8 Sep 2016

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) at the ins...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Delivers Common Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Against State of Maharashtra and Forest Authorities Concerning Land Rights. The Petitioners Challenge Actions of the Revenue and Forest Departments Regarding Classification and Possession of Lands.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Deduction of Interest Paid on Borrowed Capital. Interest paid on borrowed capital used for business purposes is allowable as deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, even if the assessee follows project completion method.

21 Jan 2016

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry After 14 Years — State's Petition Dismissed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Held Invalid for Lack of Notice and Unreasonable Delay.

1 Apr 2026

The case involves four writ petitions filed against an order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, in procee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in MAT Credit Case — Credit for Brought Forward MAT Must Be Given Before Computing Interest Under Section 234B of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that MAT credit reduces the tax payable on assessment and must be deducted from gross demand before charging interest under Section 234B.

6 Apr 2010

The appeal by the Revenue arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 20 June 2007, concerning assessment year 2000-2001. The asses...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation — Income Tax Act, 1961 Sections 147, 148, 148A, 149, 151. Reassessment notice issued beyond limitation period and without fresh information under Explanation 1 to Section 148 is invalid.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Godrej Industries Ltd., challenged a show cause notice dated 24th May 2022 under Section 148A(b), an order dated 31st July 2022 under ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Land Grant Cancellation Case Due to Inordinate 46-Year Delay. The Court held that the exercise of revisional power under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 must be within a reasonable time, and the cancellation of revenue entries after more than four decades was unsustainable, particularly when the original grant had never been challenged and revenue entries enjoyed presumptive value under Section 133.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24.10.2011 passed by the Depu...

High Court

KAHC010217682014_1

12 Jun 2015

...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)