Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
Search Results for "panchayat union"
568 result(s) found
Found 568 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Against Panchayat Development Officer and Family Members — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act Renders Prosecution Invalid. FIR under Sections 13(1)(b), 13(2), and 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 quashed as no prior sanction obtained for public servant accused.
27 May 2024The petitioners, Sri D.M. Padmanabha (a Panchayat Development Officer), his wife Smt. Bhavya, and mother Smt. Lakshmamma, filed a writ petition under ...
- 246
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute — Upholds Annulment of Election for Non-Compliance with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections) Rules, 1997. Election of Appellant Set Aside as He Failed to Produce Valid Caste Certificate at the Time of Nomination, Rendering His Candidature Invalid.
23 Nov 2023The appellant, H V Ashok, was declared elected as a member of Haridravatti Gram Panchayat from Hilagodu-3 constituency. Respondent No.1, H N Gopal, fi...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Postponement of Local Body Elections Due to Lack of Valid OBC Reservation Notification. Court Holds That State Election Commission Cannot Be Directed to Conduct Elections Without Proper Reservation Under Article 243D of Constitution and Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.
8 Jul 2022The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by various individuals challenging the decision of the State Election Commission of Maharashtra to...
- 11
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Monitors Compliance with Directions on Ex-Gratia Assistance and Death Certificates for COVID-19 Deaths. The Court noted that the National Disaster Management Authority and Union of India complied with earlier directions by issuing guidelines for Rs.50,000 ex-gratia payment under Section 12(iii) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and simplified death certification guidelines under the Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969.
4 Oct 2021The Supreme Court of India, in a miscellaneous application arising from a writ petition, was tasked with monitoring compliance with its earlier judgme...
- 197
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Curing of Minor Defect in Nomination Forms for Village Panchayat Elections — Rejection by Returning Officer Set Aside. The court held that under Rule 11(2-A) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Election Rules, a defect of missing signatures on Annexure II is minor and curable, and the Returning Officer must allow the candidate to cure it.
4 Jan 2021The petitioners, who had filed nominations from different wards of village Balsur, Taluka Omarga, District Osmanabad, challenged the decision of the R...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Gramin Dak Sevaks Pension Case — GDS Service Cannot Be Counted for Qualifying Service Under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Court held that service as Gramin Dak Sevak is not 'qualifying service' under the 1972 Rules and cannot be added to regular service for pension eligibility.
8 Nov 2019The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from decisions of various Central Administrative Tribunals and High Courts on the common quest...
- 412
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Grampanchayat's Challenge to Quarry Lease Renewal — No Prior Environmental Clearance Required for Renewal Under 1994 Notification. The Court held that the EIA Notification 1994 does not apply to renewals of leases granted before its enactment.
16 Feb 2018The case involves a writ petition filed by Grampanchayat Ambegaon through its Sarpanch Dattatray Maruti Marne, challenging the renewal of a quarry lea...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Zilla Parishad Contract Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Due to Premature Filing Before Expiry of Statutory Notice Period. The court held that a suit filed before the expiry of the two-month notice period under Section 280 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 is premature and the period of notice cannot be excluded under Section 15(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963.
6 May 2005The appellants, the Executive Engineer and Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg, were original defendants in a suit filed by the resp...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Election of Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch of Village Panchayat. Petitioners failed to establish that the election process was vitiated by fraud or that the Returning Officer lacked authority to conduct the election under the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the election of the Sarpanch and Deputy S...
- 60
