Search Results for "motor vehicles accident"

2358 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2358 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Petition Under Section 163A MV Act — Claimants Entitled to Compensation as Per Structured Formula Despite Alleged Contributory Negligence.

The appellants, Ashabai, Seema, and Umesh, are the legal representatives of the deceased Kalyan Kothi. They filed a claim petition under Section 163A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Interim Compensation Under Section 140 MV Act Cannot Be Kept in Abeyance. Tribunal erred in deferring no-fault liability compensation pending final adjudication of main claim petition.

The appellant, K.L. Vidyashankar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for injuries sustained...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Holds Insurer Liable for Autorickshaw Accident Despite Driver Lacking Transport Endorsement. Driving Licence for Light Motor Vehicle Covers Autorickshaw as Public Transport Vehicle Under Section 2(21) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 24.10.2009 passed by the MACT, Mangaluru in MV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Covered Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Held that the expression 'any person' in Section 163-A includes a pillion rider and that the petition is maintainable even in a hit-and-run case.

The appellant, Lalita wd/o Rajkumar Sawalkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which was later converted to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores MACT Award in Motor Accident Claim — High Court's Summary Reversal Set Aside for Lack of Evidence Appreciation. First Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Requires Careful Marshalling of Evidence, Not Cryptic Orders.

The present appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Chakradhar Dubey, an Assistant Post-Master, died after a truck hit the car h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Claimant's Residence Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. MACT Aurangabad had jurisdiction as claimant resided within its territorial limits, despite accident occurring elsewhere.

The appellant, Navnath s/o Shripati Bhawar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims...