Search Results for "model employer"

391 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 391 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Cancellation by TWAD Board — Holds That Cancellation Without Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and That Tender Conditions Must Be Strictly Construed.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various contractors challenging the cancellation of a tender issued by the Tamil Nadu Water Supply ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Directing NIMHANS to Grant Child Care Leave to Employee. Child Care Leave is a Statutory Right Under Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972 and Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily.

The petitioner, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), challenged an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Labour Court Award in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Corporation Failed to Prove That Daily Wage Employees Were Not Entitled to Regularisation Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Dhule Municipal Corporation filed three writ petitions challenging a common award dated 29/12/2015 passed by the Labour Court, Dhule, in Reference...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Industrial Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Directing Employer to Pay for Workmen's Defence Advocate. No Statutory Obligation on Employer to Bear Cost of Advocate for Workmen in Domestic Enquiry Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, M/s. Esdee Paints Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Injury Not Arising Out of Employment. Seaman's Back Injury While Shifting Food Boxes Held Not Covered Under Section 3 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 as Injury Did Not Arise Out of and in Course of Employment.

The case involves an appeal by M/s Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and M/s Orinoco Marine Consultancy India Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment and order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Right to Claim Both Gratuity and Retrenchment Compensation; Section 25F(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, interpreted to allow dual benefits.

The dispute originated from an industrial reference between the Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. and its workmen concerning a claim for gratuity. The employe...