Search Results for "margin requirements"

217 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 217 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Bank of India's Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Dispute Referred to Arbitration Despite Respondent's Claim of Non-Signatory Status, with Jurisdictional Issue Left to Arbitrator.

The judgment arises from a petition filed by Bank of India under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager in Embezzlement Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Misappropriation of Funds

The appellant, N. Raghavender, was the Branch Manager of Sri Rama Grameena Bank, Nizamabad Branch from May 1990 to September 1995. He was convicted by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Policy in Loan Waiver Scheme for Small and Marginal Farmers Under Article 14 Scrutiny. Classification Based on Landholding Found Rational and Non-Arbitrary, with Judicial Review Limited to Constitutional Compliance, Not Policy Wisdom.

The dispute arose from a loan waiver scheme introduced by the Government of Tamil Nadu through G.O Ms. No. 50 dated 13 May 2016, which provided waiver...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Steel Plant Operation Under Pollution Board Supervision Pending Environmental Clearance Compliance. The Court held that the High Court erred in discontinuing interim orders allowing operation under Board supervision, balancing environmental protection with livelihood concerns.

The case involves Electrosteel Steels Limited, which owns a 1.5 MTPA integrated steel plant in Bokaro, Jharkhand, employing 3,000 regular and 7,000 co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by M/s. Goldstar Metal Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2004-05. Mere Change of Opinion Cannot Justify Reopening When All Material Facts Were Disclosed During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960 and the Bombay Public Trust Act,...