Search Results for "invalid detention order"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(e) of PITNDPS Act, 1988 set aside as mere involvement in illicit traffic without affecting public order does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Kazimali @ Wasim Yunusali @ Saiyedsaab Saiyed, filed a petition through his brother-in-law challenging a preventive detention order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as the grounds relied on only related to law and order, not public order.

The petitioner, Vikas @ Tatu Harilal Maurya, was preventively detained by an order dated 10.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Impact on Public Order. Detention Based on Five Criminal Cases Under Section 304(2) BNS Found Inadequate to Establish Prejudice to Public Order Under Section 2(c) of the Act.

The case involved a petition challenging a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 snaps live link, rendering detention invalid.

The petitioner, Thiru Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 02....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Placement of Vital Bail Order. The court held that failure to place the detailed bail order before the Detaining Authority vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA.

The petitioner, Shobha Dattatray Bodake, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive detention ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained Delay of Over Two Months Between In-Camera Statements and Detention Order Breaks Live Link, Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 7th July 2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activit...