Search Results for "interest cap"

217 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 217 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989. Station Master Memo Held Insufficient to Disprove Passenger Status When Valid Ticket Was Recovered.

The appellant, Suman Madhav Dhake, filed an appeal against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, which rejected her application for compen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Ex-Servicemen's Claims for Full Disability Pension Arrears -- Union of India's Appeal Dismissed -- Judgment in Rem Overrides Limitation Periods for Recurring Pension Rights Under Armed Forces Tribunal Act

The Supreme Court addressed multiple civil appeals concerning arrears of disability pension for ex-servicemen -- The central issue was whether arrears...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Advocate-on-Record and Senior Advocate for Suppression of Facts in Criminal Appeal. Court Considers Need for Code of Conduct for Advocates-on-Record and Reconsideration of Indira Jaising Decisions.

The Supreme Court was hearing a criminal appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition filed by a convict who had been sentenced to 30 years imprisonme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Conductor in MSRTC Misappropriation Case. Labour Court's refusal to interfere with punishment of dismissal for collecting Rs.14/- but issuing Rs.5/- ticket and having cash excess of Rs.11/- is confirmed as not perverse.

The petitioner, Rohidas Premchand Bhagat, was employed as a bus conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 1 Novemb...