Search Results for "illegal permissions"

500 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 500 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order Refusing Commencement Certificate Based on Ministerial Assurance. Ministerial Assurance Cannot Override Statutory Provisions Under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Rustomjee Realty Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Builder's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Partly Quashing Stop Construction Notice and Directing Objections Under KIAD Act. The Full Bench Reserves Judgment on 06-02-2014, but the Final Decision is Not Available in the Provided Incomplete Text.

The case involves writ appeals filed by M/s Century Central, a registered partnership firm, challenging the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Police Fundraising Event for Lack of Public Interest. Court holds that the petition was filed for extraneous considerations and not genuine public interest, and that the event was for welfare of policemen and construction of a police hospital.

The petitioner, Prajasattak Samajik Seva Sanstha, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act 1860, filed a Public Interest Litigation c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to NMMC's Property Tax Levy on MIDC Industrial Area. TTC Area Held to Be Within Municipal Limits Under 1991 Notification; No Direction to Constitute Industrial Township.

The petitioners, including Small Scale Entrepreneurs Association and Mahape Industries Welfare Association, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...