Search Results for "evidentiary value"

1094 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1094 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Revenue’s Appeals Against Single Judge’s Order Quashing Section 153C Notices; Weighs Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Natural Justice Concerns.

The present judgment arises from a batch of writ appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 12.08.2022 passed by a Single Judge of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Nursery Land. Market Value Determined Based on Potential for Development and Comparable Sales Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellant, M/s. Vikas Nursery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Mother-in-Law for Dowry Death Based on Dying Declaration. Third dying declaration naming appellant as perpetrator found voluntary and trustworthy, reversing trial court's acquittal.

The case pertains to the death of Urmila @ Guddi, who was married to Jagdish Singh (Proforma Respondent No.3) about four years prior to the incident. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Challenging Enhanced Compensation for Railway Project Lands. Market Value Determination at Rs.39,20,400 per Acre by Reference Courts Contested as Inadequate by Landowners and Excessive by Railways.

These appeals and cross-objections arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State for the South Central Railway in Mahagaon village, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment and Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order in Service Charges Dispute. Applicant Company Held to be Necessary Party as Successor-in-Interest of Defendant Firm Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, Tarun Keshrichand Shah and Priyalata Keshrichand Shah, filed a suit (Suit No. 6117 of 2007) against M/s. Kishore Engineering Co. (res...