Search Results for "containers"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Customs in Central Excise Case — CESTAT Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Processing of Cotton Fabrics with Aid of Power Without Following Excise Procedures Constitutes Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Rajkot against an order of the Customs, Excise and Servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Nescafe Premix as Coffee Under Entry 3 of Schedule C Part II of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Product 'Coffee and Instant Drinks Nescafe Premix' Held Not Covered by Entry 18(2) (Beverages) Based on Common Parlance Test and Predominant Ingredient.

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case: Inland Haulage Charges Covered Under Article 8 of India-Belgium DTAA. The Court held that income from inland transport of cargo to port for international shipping is part of shipping income and not taxable as business profits.

The case involves an appeal by the Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal by Patel Engineering Ltd in Import Misdeclaration Case. Confiscation of Goods and Penalty Upheld for Violation of Sections 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, Patel Engineering Ltd, filed a Customs Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the concurrent findings of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Intermediate Product Marketability. Court holds that CESTAT failed to consider relevant evidence regarding marketability of loosely assembled fibre web used captively for manufacture of exempted jute carpets.

The appellant, M/s Hitkari Hitech Fibres Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of products under Chapters 56 and 57 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Agency Dispute — Award Declared Enforceable as Decree. Foreign Award Under Sections 46-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld as No Grounds for Refusal Under Section 48 Established.

The petitioner, Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd., a Japanese shipping company, filed a petition under Sections 46 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case - Layoff and Lockout by Company Held Illegal. Company's Failure to Obtain Permission Under Section 25M of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Subsequent Lockout Constitute Unfair Labour Practices Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Maharashtra General Kamgar Union filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Industrial Court dated 30...