Search Results for "conduct unbecoming"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "conduct unbecoming"

208 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears writ petitions and appeals challenging the Government Order dated 12 August 2008 that handed over the administration of Sri Mahabaleshwara Devaru Temple, Gokarna to Sri Ramachandrapura Mutt. The court examines the legality of the order under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, relevant endowments laws, and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Employee for Unauthorized Absence Despite Medical Reasons — No Interference with Concurrent Findings of Labour and Industrial Courts. Employee failed to prove that absence was due to illness or reasonable cause; medical certificates not sufficient to justify prolonged absence of 296 days.

21 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Deepak Bhimraj Kamble, was employed by Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. He was charge-sheeted on three occasions for unauthorized absence: f...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award Directing Regularization of 24 Workmen in National Aerospace Laboratories — Workmen Held Not Entitled to Regularization as They Were Employed by Contractor, Not Principal Employer.

7 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Management of National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL), challenged the award dated 30-12-2005 of the Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru in I....

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.16958 OF 2024

21 Jun 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Directions Against Lawyers' Strikes in Uttarakhand — Lawyers Have No Right to Strike or Boycott Courts. The Court held that strikes by advocates interfere with administration of justice and access to justice, and that Bar Councils must take disciplinary action against such conduct.

28 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the District Bar Association, Dehradun, challenging a High Court judgment that directed ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Challenge to Government's Power to Nominate University Syndicate Members Under Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000. Section 39(1) Held Valid and Not Ultra Vires Sections 28(g) and 38 of the Act.

15 Jul 2013

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of Section 39(1) of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.

10 Aug 2018

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Direction on Marking Appearances of Advocates in Court Proceedings - CBI Investigation to Remain Independent. The court held that the right to practice under Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 is not absolute and the direction requiring Advocates-on-Record to mark appearances only of authorized advocates does not infringe any legal rights.

13 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court disposed of miscellaneous applications filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment and Orders Stay of Recovery in Income Tax Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with CBDT Circular. The Assessing Officer's failure to record reasons and provide hearing under Section 281B, and ignoring CBDT Circular on stay of demand, led to setting aside of attachment and recovery proceedings.

26 Mar 2019

The Petitioner, Milestone Real Estate Fund, a trust, challenged the provisional attachment order dated 18.12.2018 under Section 281B of the Income Tax...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Lokayukta Complaint Case — Section 8(1) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Does Not Apply to Allegations. The court held that the Lokayukta's power under Section 8(1) is limited to grievances, not allegations, and quashed the Tribunal's order rejecting the petitioner's application.

9 Jan 2018

The petitioner, T.N. Raviprakash, a Second Division Surveyor with the Bangalore Development Authority, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 22...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)